You are here: Marine Issues / Nuclear and Sellafield/ Sellafield Discharges
Marine Issues
The Marine Environment Marine Fisheries Marine Aggregates Climate Change
Healthy Seas and Society Marine Aquaculture Coastal Development Nuclear and Sellafield
Policy and Governance Offshore Oil & Gas Maritime Transport Other Issues
Marine Protected Areas Offshore Renewables Marine Pollution  
Nuclear and Sellafield
OSPAR Strategy Sellafield Discharges Radiological Monitoring News and Resources

Sellafield Discharges

The British Nuclear Fuels reprocessing plant at Sellafield remains the largest single cause of exposure to artificial radionuclides. Doses resulting from operational discharges are low and, on the basis of current scientific understanding, do not pose a significant health risk at this time. However, the potential risk of contamination which might occur as a result of accidents remains a cause for concern.

Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland

Since the early 1950s, low-level liquid radioactive wastes have been discharged into the north-eastern Irish Sea from the British Nuclear Fuels Plc (BNFL) Sellafield establishment formerly known as Windscale.

Initially, the major source of these discharges was the processing of nuclear fuel for the production of nuclear weapons. Since the late 1950s, operations have been dominated by the reprocessing of fuel from commercial nuclear power programmes.

The most significant low-level radioactive wastes result from water used to purge the cooling ponds used for keeping spent fuel elements (Magnox), and from the reprocessing plant where low-level liquid waste is collected and neutralised in "sea tanks" before being discharged to sea at around high tide.

Authorised discharges take place through a series of pipelines extending 2.5km seaward of the high-water mark, with a very much smaller level of radioactivity being discharged via Sellafield's sewers.

Discharges from Sellafield have always been subject to controls by governmental departments or regulatory agencies in the UK. Currently, authorisation to discharge is granted to BNFL by the UK Environment Agency.

Over the years, the Sellafield discharges have acted as a large point source of alpha (α), beta (β) and gamma (γ) emitting radionuclides originating from both fission and neutron activation processes. This has resulted in significant increases of artificial radionuclide concentrations in parts of the Irish Sea marine environment and beyond, with minute traces detectable as far away as the Central Arctic Ocean.

The environmental impact of Sellafield's discharges depends mainly on the way in which discharged radionuclides are dispersed and accumulate in the Irish Sea.

The spatial and temporal distributions of Sellafield-derived radionuclides are governed by a number of complex mechanisms. Some important factors that influence their behaviour include the rate of input from authorised discharges, their chemical speciation on the effluent and upon contact with seawater, prevailing hydrographic conditions, and their interactions with suspended particles, sediments and biota.

Source: León Vintró et al. 2000.

Effects of Sellafield discharges on harbour porpoises

A 1999 study by the Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland and University College Cork to assess radionuclide contamination in harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in the Irish Sea waters found the radioactivity dose to be insignificant.

As top-level predators, harbour porpoises and other cetaceans receive radioactive contamination via transfer up through the food web of radionuclides present in the marine environment.

Muscle samples from 25 porpoises stranded on the coasts of Britain and Ireland or from fisheries bycatch in Irish coastal waters were analysed for artificial caesium-137 and naturally occurring potassium-40 radionuclides. The average levels of caesium-137 measured were some ten times higher in porpoises from the Irish Sea (17.8 Becquerels per kilogram-¹) compared to those from the Atlantic (1.9 Bq/kg-¹), Celtic Sea (1.7 Bq/kg-¹) and North Sea (2.4 Bq/kg-¹).

These results are consistent with monitoring studies that show that levels of caesium-137 are higher in marine life from the Irish Sea than from the Atlantic, Celtic and North Seas.

Average levels of potassium-40 (94.7 Bq/kg-¹) in porpoises were much greater than those of caesium-137 and did not vary between the different sampling locations.

The average level of caesium-137 measured in fish landed at Irish Sea ports during the same period was about 3.0 Bq/kg-¹. Porpoises consume a range of fish species; their average dose level (17.8 Bq/kg-¹) shows that the levels of caesium-137 increase with trophic level (the different feeding levels within an ecosystem).

The study concluded that the dose to porpoises from radioactivity in the marine environment was calculated and found to be insignificant. "Thus, despite the elevated levels of caesium-137 in Irish Sea porpoises relative to those from the Atlantic, Celtic and North Seas, the resulting radiation dose is unlikely to have had a detrimental effect on their health."

Source: The Irish Scientist Yearbook 1999.

 

Reference

León Vintró L., Smith K.J., Lucey J.A. and Mitchell P.I. 2000. The environmental impact of the Sellafield discharges. In: SCOPE-RADSITE Workshop, Brussels, 4-6 December 2000, 27 pp. (pdf)

 

Sellafield Discharges
Effects on harbour porpoises
MWGI policy position
MWGI policy position on Nuclear Energy and Sellafield
What does it mean?
Try the pop-up Glossary