You are here: Marine Issues / Marine Fisheries / Deep-sea Fisheries
Marine Issues
The Marine Environment Marine Fisheries Marine Aggregates Climate Change
Healthy Seas and Society Marine Aquaculture Coastal Development Nuclear and Sellafield
Policy and Governance Offshore Oil & Gas Maritime Transport Other Issues
Marine Protected Areas Offshore Renewables Marine Pollution  
Marine Fisheries
Introduction Fisheries Management Overfishing Marine Litter
Fishing Sectors Deep-sea Fisheries Bycatch and Discards Online Resources
Irish Fleet Fisheries Ecology Habitat Degradation  

Deep-sea Fisheries

With the decline of traditional commercial fish stocks such as hake and cod in shallow water continental shelf areas, European fishing fleets have increasingly turned their attention to fish stocks in deeper waters.

Deep-sea stocks are fish populations exploited in waters beyond the main fishing grounds of the continental shelves. They are distributed in waters above the outer shelf and the continental slopes or are associated with seamounts. Deep-sea fisheries are generally considered to be fisheries carried out in waters deeper than about 400m. The target fish are often long-lived, slow growing, late maturing, slow breeding species, which are particularly vulnerable to exploitation. Many are deep-living demersal (benthic or benthopelagic [1]) species found at or above the seabed. Others are pelagic and live in the mid-water column or towards the sea bottom.

With improvements in fishing technology and increased exploration, new deep-sea stocks continue to be discovered.

The deep sea and its environment

The environment inhabited by deep-sea fishes is large (comprising more than 50% of the earth’s surface) and its ocean dynamics, fisheries biology and ecosystems are poorly understood. However, over the last two decades, studies of these regions have begun to describe their often astonishing physical and biological nature. While many of these areas are flat with silt and mud-covered bottoms, others are characterized by chains of seamounts and bottom ridges and knolls. Across the continental shelves, turbidity currents have excised submarine canyons, whose importance as links to the deep seas is only beginning to be understood. Other features, such as seafloor seeps and hydrothermal vents, have produced bizarre and complex chemosynthetic communities with highly evolved and unusual faunas.

Diverse and long-lived benthic fauna, most notably the deep-water corals, are associated with seamounts and similar seafloor features. Cold-water corals have longevities potentially in excess of 10,000 years. Their structure, proud of the bottom, and brittleness make them vulnerable to destruction by trawls when inexpert skippers allow their trawls to encounter the surface of seamounts. Also of concern is the apparent high level of endemism of the species in those seamounts that have been researched; thus recruitment of many species from other seamounts may be less than would be expected.

Seamounts have oceanographic features that are important for fisheries. First, commercially important species form spawning aggregations in association with seamounts resulting in profitable catch rates, while those distant from seamounts may produce far lower rates. Second, currents flowing over seamounts bring nutrient-rich waters into the photic zone, enhancing biological production. Then, when Taylor’s Columns (named after the scientist who discovered these phenomena) form over the top of the seamount, zones are created that retain fish larvae in the region of the adult fish habitat. Further enhancement occurs when plankton migrate into the surface layers at night and are unable to descend when advected over seamounts, thus providing biomass that can be “captured” by the seamount-based ecosystems.

State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (SOFIA) 2004. Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN.

West of Ireland

A new and developing fishery continues to expand into the deep-sea regions beyond Ireland's sector of the European continental shelf edge, in waters varying in depth from about 400m to between 2,500-4,000m. This area west of Ireland includes the relatively shallow waters of the Porcupine Bank as well as the Rockall Trough and the Porcupine Sea-bight bathyal regions, where the continental slopes plunge from the shelf edge down to the deep ocean basin.

See the pop-up map of Ireland's offshore area (125k).

OSPAR Commission management regions

For management purposes, this huge area of the North-East Atlantic west of Ireland falls into OSPAR [2] Region V (Wider Atlantic) and the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) sub-areas VI and VII, although Irish vessels also operate in other deep-sea areas. Beyond the 200 nautical mile outer limit of Ireland's extensive exclusive economic zone (EEZ), which corresponds to Ireland's sector of the EU Common Fisheries Zone [3], are the High Seas, or "global commons" of international waters that lie outside national EEZ jurisdictions. Deep-sea fisheries in these particular international waters are managed under the auspices of the North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC) according to various agreements under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea [4].

OSPAR Region III and ICES sub-areas VI & VII

The fisheries

Some deep-sea fisheries in the North-East Atlantic are long established and tend to be artisanal (i.e. traditional and small-scale), using mainly static gear such as longlines. Fisheries by factory trawlers and modern longliner [5] fleets started in the late 1960s and early 1970s and gradually expanded the deep-sea fisheries. In the 1980s and 1990s, depletion of fish stocks in shelf waters provided further stimulus for several fleets — including Ireland's — to turn to deep-sea species to make a living.

Deep-sea fleets from Belgium, England & Wales, Faroes, France, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Northern Ireland, Norway, Russia, Scotland and Spain have been actively exploiting deep-sea stocks west of Ireland in recent years.

Most deep-sea fisheries have more than one target species, and may thus be considered mixed fisheries exploiting communities or suites of species. There are exceptions, such as the target fishery for Argentine (Argentina silus) by midwater or semipelagic trawls (ICES 2005a).

In addition to the general lack of knowledge about the biology of deep-sea species and the exploitation rates of stocks, the mixed catches, which result in considerable quantities of bycatch that may be discarded, mean that these fisheries are difficult to manage sustainably.

Deep-sea fishing vessels are known to trawl at depths down to 1,800m or more on the continental slopes. Such trawling activity has already extensively damaged deep, coldwater coral reefs at the edges of the continental shelf off the coasts of Ireland, Scotland and Norway. Only recently explored, these reefs are formed by just a few species of extremely slow-growing corals. They provide a habitat for many hundreds of other species, and are spawning grounds for commercially valuable fishes. Damage to such fragile and important ecosystems is of great concern (see Habitat Destruction).

Irish vessels have participated in deep-sea fisheries off the west of Ireland since 1988. In general, the fishery peaks between March and June and again from September to November. In recent years, funding through the Government's Programme for the Renewal of the Whitefish Fleet and the subsequent Fleet Development Measure have enabled Irish vessels to focus on deepwater species such as orange roughy. As well as strictly commercial voyages, vessels have also participated in trials under the European Commission's exploratory fishing voyage scheme.

Since the mid-1990s, an international fleet of up to 50 vessels have been conducting a gillnet fishery on the continental slopes to the west of Britain and Ireland, north of Shetland, at Rockall and the Hatton Bank. Although mostly based in Spain, these vessels are registered in the UK, Germany and "flag-of-convenience" countries outside the EU such as Panama (BIM 2004). However, vessels are known to occasionally land their catches at Killybegs, Fenit, Castletownbere, and Dingle. The fishery is conducted in depths between 200-1,200m using monofilament nets (gillnets or tangle nets) which are set on or just above the seafloor. The main target species are monkfish and deepwater sharks. Problems include a high level of discards (rotting fish), bycatch of non-target species, unretrieved and lost nets ("ghost nets"), and unsustainable catches of deepwater sharks (see Gillnet Fishery).

Ecosystem impacts of deep-sea fisheries

The potential ecosystem impacts of deep-sea fisheries fall into two categories:

One, the predator-prey, food web and other impacts relating to the removal of large numbers of target and bycatch species from the deep-sea and open ocean ecosystems in which these species play a role. However, due to lack of information, the effect of the removal of large numbers of top predators in deep-sea ecosystems is poorly known. Koslow et al. (2000) state that there are major questions concerning the long-term ecological implications of depleting mid-to-upper level trophic species in deep-sea ecosystems, and the impacts on prey and predator populations, but that there are few answers to these questions at present. Gianni (2004) adds that this is an area that requires urgent scientific attention given that deep-sea food webs and ecosystems are not likely to recover easily or quickly, if at all, from major perturbations caused by fishing.

Two, the physical impact of fishing gears (trawls, longlines, gillnets) on the sea bottom, in particular on sensitive, fragile or rare cold-water coral, sponge and other organisms attached to the seabed that are keystone species and/or shape the basic structure and function of biologically diverse deep-sea benthic ecosystems. (See Habitat Destruction).

Vulnerability and unsustainability

Fisheries on deepwater species have developed rapidly and the resources which they exploit are generally especially vulnerable to overexploitation. Within the ICES area species/stocks have been depleted before appropriate management measures have been implemented. It is also of concern that the landings statistics that are available may not reflect the true scale of the recent fishing activity, especially in waters outside the national EEZs.

Experience shows that some deep-sea species with life history strategies characterised by long life-spans, high age at maturity, and slow growth (e.g. orange roughy, blue ling) can be depleted very quickly and that recovery will be slow. Regeneration and growth are so slow that abundance does not increase in the depleted populations in the short or medium term. Other species with higher productivity have also been severely impacted by fisheries, but show greater resilience and potential for recovery in the medium term.

The survival rates of discards and of fish encountering gears and escaping are unknown, but many species are expected to be very vulnerable to injury, and therefore would be expected to die even if they escaped through meshes. The body shape of many deepwater fish combined with a high age/length at maturity often means that there can be a high fishing mortality of immature fish. Some species, such as blue ling, orange roughy, red sea bream, and alfonsinos aggregate in shoals, often associated with seamounts, and the fisheries have high catch rates once the shoals are located. Localized sub-units of the population can be quickly depleted by fisheries, even within a single season. Sub-units of some species (e.g. red sea bream, blue ling, and orange roughy) are known to have collapsed in some ICES areas.

It is evident that high catch rates can be maintained by moving from one concentration to another and progressively depleting the stock. Furthermore, many deepwater fisheries are on mixtures of species, making it difficult to manage the species components individually.

…Fisheries on deepwater species have often developed and expanded before sufficient information was available on which to base management advice.

In 2002 ICES concluded that most exploited deepwater species were considered to be harvested outside safe biological limits, and recommended immediate reductions in the fisheries unless they could be shown to be sustainable. New fisheries should be permitted only when they expanded very slowly, and were accompanied by programmes to collect data which would allow evaluation of the stock status. While there has been increasing research activity in deep water the fisheries have expanded more rapidly.

…Under a precautionary approach regime, and given that no new assessments could be made, the conclusion on stock status in 2004 remains similar to that made in 2002.

ICES 2005a

Irish involvement

With funding from Government and the EU PESCA scheme, about €2.5 million was allocated for sea trials aimed at developing Ireland's deep-sea fishery over a two-year period beginning in March 2000. The programme was supervised by the Bord Iascaigh Mhara/Irish Sea Fisheries Board (BIM) Fisheries Development Division in association with the Marine Institute, and built upon the commercial experience of the Killybegs (Co Donegal) vessel Mary-M and the Greencastle (Co Donegal) trawler Arctic Sun since 1996.

The seven trawlers and one longliner involved in the first year's trials, completed in November 2000, came from Greencastle, Rossaveal (Co Galway), Dingle (Co Kerry), Castletownbere (Co Cork) and Union Hall (Co Cork). Five of these were new vessels brought into the Irish fleet under the Programme for the Renewal of the Whitefish Fleet.

The trials were conducted in water depths of 500-1,200m and covered a wide area from north-west of the Shetlands to south-west of the Porcupine Bank and as far west as the Hatton Bank, some 200 nautical miles west of Rockall.

Potentially viable catches were taken of Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides), redfish (Sebastes spp.), blue ling (Molva dypterygia), Roundnose grenadier (Coryphaenoides rupestris), Portuguese dogfish/siki shark (Centroscymnus coelolepis), black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo) and deepwater cod (Mora moro). Other species taken included orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), tusk (Brosme brosme), bluemouth (Helicolenus dactylopterus), alfonsino/golden eye perch (Beryx spp) and forkbeards (Phycis spp.).

The 2001 trials included more new whitefish vessels, and focused on expanding the grounds opened up during 2000, as well as assessing the potential of other areas to the south-west and south of Ireland [6].

Deep-sea fleet additions

The Irish government has given a great deal of public subsidy to the Irish whitefish [7] fleet to, among other measures, assist the introduction of new boats and modernisation of others, including vessels equipped to undertake deep-sea fisheries.

The government's Programme for the Renewal of the Whitefish Fleet, administered by BIM, included grant aid (at 29% of the total cost) for 32 new and 11 modern second-hand vessels, and the modernisation of some 70 existing vessels. This was followed by a €95 million Fleet Development Measure aimed at continuing the renewal of the whitefish fleet between 2001 and 2006, bringing the combined investment under both schemes to €195 million. It was described by former Minister for Marine and Natural Resources, Frank Fahey, as "an investment unprecedented in the history of the State".

The Fleet Development Measure included almost €56 million of public aid for the introduction of 38 new vessels into the whitefish fleet, including several deep-sea vessels up to 46m in length, plus over €3.5 million for vessel modernisation. Ironically, the announcement was made on 28 May 2002 — the same day the European Commission published its proposals for the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy, which called for an end of public aid for building new vessels and modernising others with a view to increasing efficiency.

Recent additions to the Irish whitefish fleet have included:

Emerald Dawn — a 34m demersal twin-rig stern trawler built to operate offshore and pursue non-quota deepwater species. Built at a cost of €2.8 million. Launched at Dingle on 7 April 2000.

An Capall Ban — the first purpose-built longliner in Ireland, at a cost of €1.9 million. The 25m long vessel was built to target non-quota deep-sea species. Launched at Galway on 13 May 2000.

Fiona K II — a €1.65 million new-build trawler. The fourteenth vessel to be delivered under the Programme for Renewal. Involved in deepwater fishing for non-quota species. Launched at Dingle on 16 June 2000

Foyle Warrior and Northern Celt — two new trawlers built at a cost of €1.9 million each. They are fully capable of participating in the deep-sea fishery. Launched at Greencastle on 2 July 2000.

Catherine R and Regina Ponti — two new trawlers, 30m and 34.5m respectively, with a combined value of €5.3 million. They have been fishing for deepwater species since their launch at Greencastle on 10 August 2001.

Avro Chieftain and Avro Warrior — two 52m "super longliners" built to join An Capall Ban in longlining operations for deep-sea species west of Ireland, and in the wider North Atlantic. Each vessel uses a 65,000-hook autoline longlining system. The Avro Chieftain participated in BIM-supervised exploratory fishing trials on several seamounts to the south of the Azores in 500-700m depths. The target species was wreckfish (Polyprion americanus), a large oceanic species of high value. Other commercial species by-caught included deepwater cod (Mora moro), gulper shark (Centrophorus spp.), forkbeards (Phycis spp.), bluemouth (Helicolenus dactylopterus), deepwater ray and conger eel. When working the seamounts, the vessel sustained repeated gear damage. After 5-6 weeks at sea, catches were landed at Killybegs.

Since 2001, under EU regulations all newly commissioned vessels have been required to carry both scientific and technical observers, as required under the general conservation principles of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, and the complementary 1995 FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries. Consequently, BIM began a comprehensive programme of scientific and technical data collection on Irish vessels. The data is made available to the Advisory Committee on Fishery Management (ACFM) of ICES. During 2001, five observers recorded 87% of the fishing days of 10 newly commissioned boats fishing deep-sea species.

Recent Irish fishery activity

Landings data are given in pop-up Table 1.

During 2001 there was a significant increase in deep-sea fishery activity by Irish vessels. Up to fourteen vessels currently take part in the various fisheries, including a number of trawlers targeting orange roughy on seamounts, but also along the slopes of ICES subarea VII. Other trawlers have been fishing blue ling, roundnose grenadier, black scabbard, orange roughy and sharks along the continental slopes of subareas VI and VII and there has been continued activity in the Faroe-Shetland Channel, catching redfish and Greenland halibut. Several Irish longliners have been fishing in a number of different areas including the continental slopes, Hatton Bank and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.

 

Footnotes

1. Benthopelagic fishes are those that swim freely and habitually near the ocean floor.

2. OSPAR Commission for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic.

3. Which is subject to EU governance through the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP).

4. In particular, the UN Agreement on Straddling Stocks and the 1995 FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries.

5. Spain and Norway have a tradition of longlining, but this fishing method is relatively new to Ireland. It offers several advantages over trawling. Firstly, the vessel can fish in areas where trawlers cannot, such as above shipwrecks, reefs and rough seabed. Secondly, the quality of the catch is improved because the fish are individually caught, which yields a higher price at market compared to trawl-captured fish. Thirdly, the vessel can operate in almost all weathers, as the lines are "set", i.e. suspended from the top and anchored at the bottom, and not towed behind the vessel. Longlining can be used to catch both pelagic and demersal deep-sea fishes. Modern longlines may extend for more than 50km, and involve the setting of more than 1,000 hooks on a single line.

6. There are currently three designated trial deep-sea fishing grounds (500-1,700m depth) within Ireland's EEZ: West of Tory Island, North Porcupine Bank and West Porcupine Bank.

7. i.e. demersal fish (often referred to as whitefish), which live at or near the seabed.

References, sources and further reading

BIM. 2004. A preliminary Investigation on Shelf Edge and Deepwater Fixed Net Fisheries to the West and North of Great Britain, Ireland, around Rockall and Hatton Bank. DEEPNET Report. (pdf 3Mb)

Bord Iascaigh Mhara / Irish Sea Fisheries Board (BIM) incl. press release, 12-10-2000.

Central Statistics Office (CSO). Fishery Statistics 2000, 10-01-2002.

European Commission. Proposal for a Council Regulation fixing for 2002 the fishing opportunities for deep-sea fish stocks. COM(2001)764 final. Brussels, 10-12- 2001.

European Commission DG Fisheries:

Fisheries Council of 17-18 December 2001 - Results. Press release, 19-12-2001.

Fisheries Council of 14-15 December 2000 - Results. Press release, 16-12-2000.

FIS - Fish Information & Services.

Gianni M. 2004. High seas bottom trawl fisheries and their impacts on the biodiversity of vulnerable deep-sea ecosystems: Options for international action. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. (pdf 2.7Mb)

Hamilton-Paterson J. 2002. Troubled Waters. The Guardian, 28-03-2002.

ICES:

Is time running out for deep-sea fish? Article on ICES website.

Seamounts – hotspots of marine life. Article on ICES website.

ICES. 2005a. Report of the ICES Advisory Committee on Fishery Management, Advisory Committee on the Marine Environment and Advisory Committee on Ecosystems, 2005. ICES Advice. Volumes 1-11. 1,403 pp. (pdf)

ICES. 2005b. Advice on deepwater stocks (EC FISH). (pdf)

ICES. 2005c. Deep-water Fisheries Resources South of 63ºN. (pdf)

ICES. 2002. Report of the ICES Working Group on the Biology and Assessment of Deep-Sea Fisheries Resources, 4-10 April 2002 (ICES CM 2002/ACFM:16).

Koslow J.A., Boehlert G.W., Gordon J.D.M., Haedrich R.L., Lorance P. and Parin N. 2000. Continental slope and deep-sea fisheries: Implications for a fragile ecosystem. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57: 548-557. Cited in: Gianni 2004.

Marine Institute:

Stock Book 2005 – Annual Review of Fish Stocks in 2005 with Management Advice for 2006. Fisheries Science Services (FSS), Marine Institute, Ireland.

Deepwater Fisheries Overview. Marine Fisheries Services Division Stock Book 2002. (pdf)

Deepwater Fisheries Overview. Marine Fisheries Services Division Stock Book 2001. (pdf)

Deepwater Stocks South of 63°N. Marine Fisheries Service Division Stock Book 2002. (pdf)

Deepwater Stocks South of 63°N. Marine Fisheries Service Division Stock Book 2001. (pdf)

Golden Redfish (Sebastes marinus) Sub-areas V and VI, XII and XIV. Marine Fisheries Service Division Stock Book 2001. (pdf)

Marine Institute. 1999. Ireland's Marine and Coastal Areas and Adjacent Seas: An Environmental Assessment. Prepared by the Marine Institute on behalf of the Department of the Environment & Local Government and the Department of the Marine & Natural Resources, March 1999.

The Stock Book 2005 (annual review of fish stocks in 2005 with management advice for 2006), published by the Marine Institute's Fisheries Science Services (FSS): Deepwater Stocks South of 63°N. (pdf 335k)

North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC):

Report of the 20th Annual Meeting of the NEAFC, 5-9 November 2001.

Management Measures on Pelagic Fishery for Redfish for 2002. 5-9 November 2002.

OSPAR Commission. Quality Status Report 2000.

Seas At Risk. Management of deep water fisheries. Letter to European Fisheries Commissioner Franz Fischler, 13-11-2000.

The Irish Skipper, April & May 2002.

 

Deep-sea Fisheries
West of Ireland
The fisheries
Ecosystem impacts
Irish involvement
Deep-sea fleet additions
Recent Irish fishery activity
Deep-sea Species
Management of Fisheries
Stock Book 2005
Gillnet Fishery
Orange Roughy Fishery
Redfish Fishery
Habitat Destruction
Online Resources
CoastWeb coastal and marine portal
MWGI Policy Position on Deep-sea Fisheries
CoastWeb coastal and marine portal
Deep Sea Conservation Coalition
What does it mean?
Try the pop-up Glossary