You are here: Marine Issues / Marine Aquaculture / Impacts of Aquaculture / Introduced Species
Marine Issues
The Marine Environment Marine Fisheries Marine Aggregates Climate Change
Healthy Seas and Society Marine Aquaculture Coastal Development Nuclear and Sellafield
Policy and Governance Offshore Oil & Gas Maritime Transport Other Issues
Marine Protected Areas Offshore Renewables Marine Pollution  
Marine Aquaculture
Fish Farming in Ireland Government Policy Novel Species Online Resources
Impacts of Aquaculture Regulation of Aquaculture Open Ocean Aquaculture  

ICES Code of Practice

In 1995 the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) issued a Code of Practice on the Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (pdf 323k), subsequently revised in 2004, establishing a North Atlantic regional policy approach to preventing problems resulting from species introductions for fisheries enhancement and marine aquaculture purposes.

The 2004 Code of Practice follows the precautionary approach adopted by the FAO with the goal of reducing the spread of exotic species.

"It accommodates the risks associated with current commercial practices including trade in ornamental species and bait organisms, research, and the import of live species for immediate human consumption (these are not species that are intended to be released to the environment, so a notification to ICES is neither appropriate nor practical). It also includes species that are utilized to eradicate previously introduced harmful and native species, as well as genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and polyploids (specifically triploids and tetraploids). It outlines a consistent, transparent process for the evaluation of a proposed new introduction, including detailed biological background information and an evaluation of risks.

ICES views the Code of Practice as a guide to recommendations and procedures… While initially designed for the ICES Member Countries concerned with the North Atlantic and adjacent seas, all countries across the globe are encouraged to implement this Code of Practice. Public awareness of the concerns associated with introductions and transfers of marine organisms is essential to assist in the prevention of problems associated with such introductions. Countries are therefore encouraged to ensure the widest distribution of this code." (ICES 2004).

The Code of Practice sets forth recommended procedures and practices to diminish the risks of detrimental effects from the intentional introduction and transfer of marine (including brackish water) organisms, including introductions into closed containment systems. It applies to public (commercial and governmental), private, and scientific interests. "In short, any persons engaged in activities that could lead to the intentional or accidental release of exotic species should be aware of the procedures covered by the Code of Practice" (Preamble).

The Code of Practice is divided into sections of recommendations relating to:

  1. a strategy for implementation,
  2. the steps to take prior to introducing a new species,
  3. the steps to take after deciding to proceed with an introduction,
  4. policies for ongoing introductions or transfers which have been an established part of commercial practice,
  5. the steps to take prior to releasing genetically modified organisms, and
  6. the steps to take prior to releasing polyploidy organisms.

Ireland's obligations
Ireland is an ICES Member Country. Consequently, in relation to aquaculture involving introduced species, Ireland is obliged to implement the 2004 or more recent version of the ICES Code of Practice on the Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms..

ICES Member Countries contemplating new introductions are requested to present "in good time" to the ICES Council a detailed prospectus on the rationale and plan for any new introduction of a marine (brackish) species; the contents of the prospectus are detailed in Section II of the Code and Appendix A. If any introduction or transfer proceeds following approval, ICES requests Member Countries to keep the Council informed about it, "both through providing details of the broodstock established and the fate of the progeny, and through submitting progress reports after a species is released into the wild" (Preamble) according to Section III of the Code.

The 2004 Code of Practice states:

"All introductions and transfers of marine organisms carry risks associated with target and non-target species (including disease agents). Once established, introduced species can spread from foci of introductions and have undesirable ecological, genetic, economic, and human health impacts.

Introductions of marine organisms occur in the course of many human activities, including but not limited to aquaculture, stocking, live trade (e.g., species used for aquaria, ornamentals, bait, and food), research, biocontrol, and the use of genetically modified organisms. Even species introduced intentionally into closed systems can be released accidentally. Thus, introductions can result whenever live organisms are moved, regardless of the original intent. As a result, a risk of introduction and subsequent impacts exists with any movement and should be considered explicitly.

This Code of Practice provides a framework to evaluate new intentional introductions, and also recommends procedures for species that are part of current commercial practices to reduce the risk of unwanted introductions, and adverse effects that can arise from species movement."

Agencies of Member Countries "should fully implement the Code of Practice and apply all regulatory measures possible to prevent unauthorized introductions", and to reduce illegal and unauthorised introductions, "Member Countries are also encouraged to increase public awareness about the risks associated with importing live products" (Section I Strategy for implementation).

Member Countries contemplating any new introduction are expected to submit to the ICES Council "well in advance" a detailed prospectus on the proposed new introduction(s) for evaluation and comment:

"The prospectus should include the purpose and objectives of the introduction, the stage(s) in the life cycle proposed for introduction, the native range, the donor location, and the target area(s) of release. The prospectus should also include a review of the biology and ecology of the species as these pertain to the introduction (such as the physical, chemical, and biological requirements for reproduction and growth, and natural and human-mediated dispersal mechanisms) and information on the receiving environment.

The prospectus should also provide a detailed analysis of the potential impacts on the aquatic ecosystem of the proposed introduction. This should include, wherever possible, assessments from previous introductions. This analysis should include a thorough review of:

i) the ecological, genetic, and disease impacts and relationships of the proposed introduction in its natural range and donor location;

ii) the expected ecological, genetic, and disease impacts and relationships of the introduction in the proposed release site and projected range, as well as vectors for further distribution;

iii) an economic assessment, where appropriate.

The prospectus should conclude with an overall assessment of the issues, problems, and benefits associated with the proposed introduction. An evaluation of risks… should be included.

Upon review of the prospectus, the ICES Council will provide comments and recommendations on the proposed introduction" (Section II Recommended procedure for all species prior to reaching a decision regarding new introductions).

Section III of the Code of Practice outlines the actions to be taken if the decision is taken to proceed with the introductions, whilst Section IV outlines the recommended procedure for introduced or transferred species which are part of current commercial practice. Section V concerning general considerations regarding the release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) states:

"Recognizing that little information still exists on the genetic, ecological, and other effects of the release of genetically modified organisms into the natural environment (where such releases may result in the mixing of altered and wild populations of the same species, and in changes to the environment), the Council urges Member Countries to establish strong legal measures [1] to regulate such releases, including the mandatory licensing of physical or juridical persons engaged in genetically modifying, or in importing, using, or releasing any genetically modified organism."

Section VI outlines the recommended procedure for all GMOs [2] prior to reaching a decision regarding new releases, whilst Section VII recommends actions if the decision is taken to proceed with the release. Sections VII to X relate to polyploid organisms [3].

Appendix A to the Code of Practice gives detailed information requirements for inclusion in the prospectus. This information is used to conduct the biological risk review (Appendix B). Appendix C concerns the quarantine process and provides detailed information on suggested requirements for quarantine facilities. Appendix D concerns monitoring.

 

Footnotes

1. such as the Council Directive of 12 March 2001 on the Deliberate Release into the Environment of Genetically Modified Organisms (2001/18/CE).     [Back]

2. An organism in which the genetic material has been altered anthropogenically by means of recombinant DNA technologies. This definition includes transgenic organisms, i.e., an organism bearing within its genome one or more copies of novel genetic constructs produced by recombinant DNA technology, but excludes chromosome manipulated organisms (i.e., polyploids).     [Back]

3. Polyploids are chromosome-manipulated organisms, where the number of chromosomes has been changed through cell manipulation techniques. A polyploid organism is not a genetically modified organism (GMO).     [Back]

References

FAO. 2003. Database on the Introductions of Aquatic Species (DIAS). Fisheries Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

FAO. 1995. The Code of Conduct For Responsible Fisheries (CCRF). Fisheries Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (pdf 303k)

ICES. 2002. Code of Practice on the Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (ITMO). International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), Copenhagen, Denmark. (pdf 323k)

 

Impacts of Aquaculture
Impacts of Finfish Farming
Impacts of Shellfish Farming
Introduced Species
Intentionally introduced
Intentionally transferred
Accidental introductions
ICES Code of Practice
EU policy on introductions
Genetic Modification
Welfare of Farmed Fish

The Pure Salmon campaign believes salmon can be farmed safely and with minimal ecological damage, if the industry adopts standards that protect the environment, consumers and local communities.
What does it mean?
Try the pop-up Glossary